Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Shouldn't it be RuntimeError?
Proposed patch makes RuntimeError be raised with chained original exception. This preserves more information. >>> class FaultyImplementation: ... def __set_name__(self, *args): ... 1/0 ... >>> class TheoreticallyCouldWork: ... attr = FaultyImplementation() ... ZeroDivisionError: division by zero During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> RuntimeError: Error calling __set_name__ on 'FaultyImplementation' instance 'attr' in 'TheoreticallyCouldWork' ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file45028/set_name_error.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue28214> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
