Martin Panter added the comment:

I think your code example is not very robust, because the “sock” object refers 
to a freed file descriptor, and could easily close an unrelated file:

$ python3.5 -q
>>> import socket
>>> sock0 = socket.socket()
>>> sock = socket.socket(fileno=sock0.fileno())
>>> sock0.close()
>>> f = open("/dev/null")  # Unrelated code/thread opens a file
>>> sock.close()  # Closes unrelated file descriptor!
>>> f.close()  # Error even in 3.5
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
OSError: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor

I am not familiar with your use case or library, but I would suggest that 
either:

1. Your code should call sock0.detach() rather than fileno(), so that sock0 no 
longer “owns” the file descriptor, or

2. libuv should not close file descriptors that it doesn’t own.

Calling socket.close() should be safe if the Python socket object is registered 
as closed, but IMO calling close(), or any other method, when the OS socket 
(file descriptor) has been released behind Python’s back is a programming error.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue26685>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to