R. David Murray added the comment: OK. There is definitely something that could be done here if someone wants to tackle it. At a minimum, read the lines that we can read and produce a warning of some sort for the ones we can't. If more than one other mh style programming is allowing this variant syntax, we could also choose to support it.
I'm going to reclassify this as an enhancement because it appears to be support for "new" formatting, but I'm not adverse to considering it a bug. ---------- resolution: third party -> stage: resolved -> status: closed -> open type: behavior -> enhancement _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue28473> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com