R. David Murray added the comment:

OK.  There is definitely something that could be done here if someone wants to 
tackle it.  At a minimum, read the lines that we can read and produce a warning 
of some sort for the ones we can't.  If more than one other mh style 
programming is allowing this variant syntax, we could also choose to support it.

I'm going to reclassify this as an enhancement because it appears to be support 
for "new" formatting, but I'm not adverse to considering it a bug.

----------
resolution: third party -> 
stage: resolved -> 
status: closed -> open
type: behavior -> enhancement

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue28473>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to