Darryl Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Hmmm, I'm not certain I agree; on 2.4/2.5 doing rec(999) hits the recursion limit, as expected (makes sense that there would be an item or two on the stack prior to the immediate call to rec() ). This looks more like the interpreter is adding 4x the number of items to the stack during the construction of the nested object, which seems pretty surprising/broken...
_______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3373> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
