New submission from Masayuki Yamamoto:

Platform that appeared warning is Vista Cygwin x86. Interpreter execution 
doesn't crash because _setmode function is supplied from cygwin1.dll that 
always linked.
Warning reason is header io.h [*] doesn't include to source file. Therefore I 
wrote two patches for 3.7 and 2.7.

[*] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/tw4k6df8.aspx (Cygwin also 
avaliable)

build log on 3.7:

gcc -c -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall 
-Wstrict-prototypes    -std=c99 -Wextra -Wno-unused-result 
-Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-missing-field-initializers   -I. -I./Include    
-DPy_BUILD_CORE -o Modules/main.o Modules/main.c
Modules/main.c: In function 'Py_Main':
Modules/main.c:599:5: warning: implicit declaration of function '_setmode' 
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     _setmode(fileno(stdin), O_BINARY);
     ^
gcc -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall 
-Wstrict-prototypes    -std=c99 -Wextra -Wno-unused-result 
-Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-missing-field-initializers   -I. -I./Include    
-DPy_BUILD_CORE  -I./Modules/_io -c ./Modules/_io/fileio.c -o Modules/fileio.o
./Modules/_io/fileio.c: In function '_io_FileIO___init___impl':
./Modules/_io/fileio.c:478:5: warning: implicit declaration of function 
'_setmode' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     _setmode(self->fd, O_BINARY);
     ^

----------
components: Build
files: include-io.h.patch
keywords: patch
messages: 281389
nosy: benjamin.peterson, masamoto, stutzbach
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Warning: implicit declaration of function '_setmode'
type: compile error
versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.6, Python 3.7
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file45592/include-io.h.patch

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue28768>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to