Francisco Demartino added the comment: Serhiy, Chris, thank you for your additional comments. They surely helped me understand why my solution to this "problem?" isn't that good (also I slept on it a bit and maybe that helped).
I still ponder for a way to get autocompletion while guarranteeing no code will run, but a) any getter code is meant to run in that way, and b) it would somehow need to know the result of running that code without running it (Tricky, huh?). Thanks again for your patience. I feel enlightened :) ---------- status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29630> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
