STINNER Victor added the comment: I just ran a microbenchmark, 3.6 compared to 3.5:
haypo@smithers$ ./python -m perf timeit -s 'from functools import partial; f = lambda x, y: None; g = partial(f, 1)' 'g(2)' --duplicate=100 --compare-to ../3.5/python --python-names=3.5:3.6 3.5: ..................... 151 ns +- 4 ns 3.6: ..................... 150 ns +- 4 ns Median +- std dev: [3.5] 151 ns +- 4 ns -> [3.6] 150 ns +- 4 ns: 1.00x faster (-0%) Not significant! => not significant, so I close the issue. FYI 3.7 is not significant neither: $ ./python -m perf timeit -s 'from functools import partial; f = lambda x, y: None; g = partial(f, 1)' 'g(2)' --duplicate=100 --compare-to ../3.5/python --python-names=3.5:3.7 Median +- std dev: [3.5] 150 ns +- 4 ns -> [3.7] 150 ns +- 3 ns: 1.00x faster (-0%) Not significant! ---------- resolution: -> out of date stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue28243> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
