Oren Milman added the comment: I don't have a use case for that. (I noticed this behavior by chance, while working on some other issue.)
However, IIUC, commit 4fa88fa0ba35e25ad9be66ebbdaba9aca553dc8b, by Benjamin Peterson, Antoine Pitrou and Amaury Forgeot d'Arc, includes patching the aforementioned StringIO functions, so that they would accept integer types. So I add them to the nosy list, as I guess that the use cases for accepting integer types in StringIO methods are also use cases for accepting integer types in BytesIO. And now that you mention the docs, according to them, both StringIO and BytesIO inherit these methods from BufferedIOBase or IOBase. Thus, the methods are already expected to behave the same, aren't they? ---------- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, pitrou _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29741> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
