Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
There are accuracy issues with tgamma() and lgamma() on Windows. But less than
on OS X.
======================================================================
FAIL: test_mtestfile (test.test_math.MathTests)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\projects\cpython\lib\test\test_math.py", line 1287, in test_mtestfile
'\n '.join(failures))
AssertionError: Failures in test_mtestfile:
lgam0085: lgamma(-99.99999999999999): expected -331.85460524980596, got
-331.86198661322277 (error = 0.00738 (129854318490 ulps); permitted error =
1e-15 or 5 ulps)
gam0085: gamma(-99.99999999999999): expected 7.540083334884096e-145, got
7.484632144060724e-145 (error = 5.55e-147 (38979707393612 ulps); permitted
error = 0 or 20 ulps)
gam0124: gamma(-176.5): expected -1.196e-321, got 0.0 (error = 1.2e-321 (243
ulps); permitted error = 0 or 20 ulps)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does this mean that we should not use libc implementations of tgamma() and
lgamma() on Windows?
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue26121>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
