Xiang Zhang added the comment:
I still hold my opinion that the current behaviour is correct. You are
comparing two networks and you should count the mask in.
And notice that `neta == netb` is not totally equal to
`neta.compare_networks(netb)`. The former can only results True or False but
the later could result -1, 0 and 1. For example:
>>> IPv4Network('192.0.2.0/25') == IPv4Network('192.0.2.0/25')
True
>>> IPv4Network('192.0.2.0/25').compare_networks(IPv4Network('192.0.2.0/25'))
0
>>>
They can't be used exchangably. `compare_networks` actually does the work of
all <, >, ==.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29913>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
