Jim Fasarakis-Hilliard added the comment: I was probably misunderstood, too, in hindsight, it's my fault for not being more clear :-).
In my first sentence I was merely pointing out the oddity of <prefix>-string not being a very popular term until f-string came along. As for my second sentence (adding the other prefixed strings to the glossary) I was thinking of using the names people currently use. Entries for (byte|raw|unicode)-strings, seeing as they don't already exist, might be a good addition now that f-strings are up for inclusion. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29928> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
