Eric V. Smith added the comment:

Just a guess, but it's because this code was written at a time when subclassing 
was the preferred way to extend code. Now we know better :), but it's not 
possible to change history, unfortunately. Lots of code depends on the current 
behavior.

If you find a way to make a factory function work, while preserving backward 
comparability, then we can re-open this issue and consider the enhancement 
request then.

----------
nosy: +eric.smith
resolution:  -> rejected
stage:  -> resolved
status: open -> closed
versions:  -Python 2.7, Python 3.3, Python 3.4, Python 3.5, Python 3.6

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29947>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to