New submission from Nathaniel Smith:

If we have a chain of generators/coroutines that are 'yield from'ing each 
other, then resuming the stack works like:

- call send() on the outermost generator
- this enters _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault, which re-executes the YIELD_FROM opcode
- which calls send() on the next generator
- which enters _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault, which re-executes the YIELD_FROM opcode
- ...etc.

However, every time we enter _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault, the first thing we do is 
to check for pending signals, and if there are any then we run the signal 
handler. And if it raises an exception, then we immediately propagate that 
exception *instead* of starting to execute bytecode. This means that e.g. a 
SIGINT at the wrong moment can "break the chain" – it can be raised in the 
middle of our yield from chain, with the bottom part of the stack abandoned for 
the garbage collector.

The fix is pretty simple: there's already a special case in _PyEval_EvalFrameEx 
where it skips running signal handlers if the next opcode is SETUP_FINALLY. (I 
don't see how this accomplishes anything useful, but that's another story.) If 
we extend this check to also skip running signal handlers when the next opcode 
is YIELD_FROM, then that closes the hole – now the exception can only be raised 
at the innermost stack frame.

This shouldn't have any performance implications, because the opcode check 
happens inside the "slow path" after we've already determined that there's a 
pending signal or something similar for us to process; the vast majority of the 
time this isn't true.

I'll post a PR in a few minutes that has a test case that demonstrates the 
problem and fails on current master, plus the fix.

----------
components: Interpreter Core
messages: 291469
nosy: njs, yselivanov
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Resuming a 'yield from' stack is broken if a signal arrives in the middle
versions: Python 3.5, Python 3.6, Python 3.7

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30039>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to