larsonreever added the comment:

Otherwise, py8601 (https://bitbucket.org/micktwomey/pyiso8601/) looks pretty 
popular and well maintained (various committers, started in 2012, last commit 
in 2016).  I don't think that we should add the iso8601 module to the stdlib, 
but merge iso8601 "features" into the datetime module.  The iso8601 module 
supports Python 2.7 and so has to implement its own timezone classes. The 
datetime module now has datetime.timezone since Python 3.2 for fixed timezone. 
To me it's the finest, the most elegant, and no other one can claim to be more 
robust since it's probably the #1 iso parsing functions used in python. Have a 
look at 
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.9/_modules/django/utils/dateparse/#parse_datetime.

----------
nosy: +larsonreever

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15873>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to