Chi Hsuan Yen added the comment: I guess you were asking whether the newly compiled Python binary is able to build extension modules or not? I rebased PR 139 against the latest git master and seems it's fine. Running `make distclean`, `./configure` and then `make` builds all modules as expected. The result is the same on Travis CI and Appveyor.
About "elegant": I guess the only issue regarding elegancy in my patch is the local import in GNUTranslations._parse(). For me moving setup.py away from deprecated modules is a good reason for introducing local imports. Does it sound OK? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29442> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
