Barry A. Warsaw added the comment: On May 30, 2017, at 10:36 PM, Yury Selivanov wrote:
>Again, the natural way of something like Controller to end up in asyncio is >to either go through full PEP process, or live some time on PyPI and prove to >be useful. A PEP feels like overkill; we don't require PEPs for every addition to an existing stdlib module or package. My worry too is that a PEP tends to evoke endless bikeshedding. I appreciate that you want to be careful not to saddle asyncio with too much baggage, or that you don't feel Controller is significant enough to generalize and put in the package. Perhaps a middle ground would be to label parts of the asyncio API provisional, and add Controller to that? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue30300> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
