STINNER Victor added the comment: See also "[Python-ideas] Positional-only parameters" discussion of last March: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2017-March/044956.html
Brett Cannon: "It seems all the core devs who have commented on this are in the positive (Victor, Yury, Ethan, Yury, Guido, Terry, and Steven; MAL didn't explicitly vote). So to me that suggests there's enough support to warrant writing a PEP. (...)" (No, I didn't write such PEP yet :-p) Maybe we can also enhance the error message to explain that the function accepts exactly one positional-only argument? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue30534> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
