Milan Oberkirch added the comment: I see your point, but I'm not fully convinced it relates to this PR directly: the code here just uses the standard interface to use an 'idna' codec. If that codec is buggy that is a different issue.
If it's so buggy that using it is absolutely pointless, it should not exist in the first place IMHO. But if we need to keep a useless codec for compabilety reasons and you prefer adding a now codec (e.g. 'idna-2008') I agree that we should put this PR on hold until a codec it could use exists. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11783> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com