New submission from Max Rothman:
For a function f with the signature f(foo=None), the following three calls are
equivalent:
f(None)
f(foo=None)
f()
However, only the first two are equivalent in the eyes of
unittest.mock.Mock.assert_called_with:
>>> with patch('__main__.f', autospec=True) as f_mock:
f_mock(foo=None)
f_mock.assert_called_with(None)
<no exception>
>>> with patch('__main__.f', autospec=True) as f_mock:
f_mock(None)
f_mock.assert_called_with()
AssertionError: Expected call: f() Actual call: f(None)
This is definitely surprising to new users (it was surprising to me!) and
unnecessarily couples tests to how a particular piece of code happens to call a
function.
----------
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 297433
nosy: Max Rothman
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: unittest.mock.Mocks with specs aren't aware of default arguments
versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.6
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30821>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
