STINNER Victor added the comment: > Usually we first merge a patch in master and after that cherry-pick it to > other branches.
Right. But in this case, I needed the patch for each branch, to run the test on all branches to write a blog post :-) Here are results (blog post spoiler!): Table showing the C stack consumption in bytes, and the difference compared to Python 3.5 (last release before I started working on FASTCALL): ==================== ================ ===== ================ ================ Function 2.7 3.5 3.6 3.7 ==================== ================ ===== ================ ================ test_python_call 1,360 (**+352**) 1,008 1,120 (**+112**) 960 (**-48**) test_python_getitem 1,408 (**+288**) 1,120 1,168 (**+48**) 880 (**-240**) test_python_iterator 1,424 (**+192**) 1,232 1,200 (**-32**) 1,024 (**-208**) Total 4,192 (**+832**) 3,360 3,488 (**+128**) 2,864 (**-496**) ==================== ================ ===== ================ ================ Table showing the number of function calls before a stack overflow, and the difference compared to Python 3.5: ==================== =================== ====== =================== =================== Function 2.7 3.5 3.6 3.7 ==================== =================== ====== =================== =================== test_python_call 6,161 (**-2,153**) 8,314 7,482 (**-832**) 8,729 (**+415**) test_python_getitem 5,951 (**-1,531**) 7,482 7,174 (**-308**) 9,522 (**+2,040**) test_python_iterator 5,885 (**-916**) 6,801 6,983 (**+182**) 8,184 (**+1,383**) Total 17,997 (**-4600**) 22,597 21,639 (**-958**) 26,435 (**+3,838**) ==================== =================== ====== =================== =================== ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue30866> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
