Steven D'Aprano added the comment: > This means that a user who wishes to use '--' in some other way is out of > luck.
I think that's a feature, not a limitation. Command line arguments should use broadly consistent conventions. I don't want one program to use '--' for "end of options" and another program to use it for "something else". Suppose you want to use '--' for "foo", and '%%' (say) as the end of options terminator. Whatever foo is. Okay, just swap them -- keep the usual convention where '--' is the options terminator, and use '%%' for foo. That way your users won't be surprised and confused by your application working differently from the great bulk of commandline applications. (Users never read the manual.) But maybe I'll change my mind if you can show that there's already a very common, and useful, alternative convention of '--' for foo, for some definition of foo. ---------- nosy: +steven.daprano _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue31012> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
