Guido van Rossum added the comment: > > there's no way to end the loop on the producing side.
> I might be missing something, but can't something similar be said of > queue.get()? That's my point, actually. If you are wrapping the Queue protocol with __aiter__/__anext__ the caller would expect there's a way to signal to the latter that the loop is over (so it can raise StopAsyncIteration). But since .get() doesn't have a way to signal this, an async for-loop would not be able to terminate (other than through break). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue28777> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
