Vinay Sajip added the comment: > You only have to make sure they do not use this logger without knowing about > new format, which can be done in various ways (like prefixing the name of the > logger, for example).
That's the problem, right there. I don't think the ways of doing this are bulletproof and require too much cooperation between third-party libraries. > using non-legacy formatting in logging message is really cumbersome I don't see how it's "really cumbersome". A simple approach is outlined in http://plumberjack.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/supporting-alternative-formatting.html So that logging using brace formatting could be as simple as logger.misc(__('User {} logged in', username)) which is also described in the documentation here: https://docs.python.org/3.3/howto/logging-cookbook.html#use-of-alternative-formatting-styles ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue30995> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
