Nathaniel Smith added the comment: On further investigation (= a few hours staring at the ceiling last night), it looks like there's another explanation for my particular bug... which is good, because on further investigation (= a few hours squinting at google results) it looks like this probably can't happen on x86/x86-64 (I think? maybe?).
It's still true though that you can't just throw in a 'volatile' and expect cross-thread synchronization to work -- that's not C's semantics, and it's not true on popular architectures like ARM. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue31119> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
