New submission from nvdv: Unfortunately concurrent.futures.ProcessPoolExecutor does not provide any means to interact with worker processes (like initializer function in multiprocessing.Pool constructor).
This problem has been mentioned at least once: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133697.html. It's not hard to work around this issue by subclassing ProcessPoolExecutor and adding all necessary methods, but IMO solution can be more generic. ---------- components: Library (Lib) messages: 299921 nosy: nvdv priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: add initializer to concurrent.futures.ProcessPoolExecutor type: enhancement versions: Python 3.6 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue31144> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
