Nick Coghlan added the comment: While I agree the line is blurry, extending automatic disassembly to cover new types is currently still considered a new feature in the dis module rather than a bug in the addition of those new types to the language.
Whether or not that's the *right* policy, or if we should consider tweaking it so that oversights in `dis` and `inspect` are treated as bugs in the addition of affected types, would be a question for python-dev (fortunately, the new cherry-pick based workflow means the current PR review can proceed independently of that question). ---------- versions: -Python 3.6 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue31183> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
