STINNER Victor added the comment: > Isn't this a duplicate of issue16137 which was closed with the resolution > "won't fix"?
This issue seems to be a crash on Windows using negative year. You proposed a patch using asctime_s() instead of asctime(). So the fix is specific to Windows. This issue is now qualified as a security vulnerability (msg301255), so we have to fix it. My proposed PR 3293 fixes the crash on musl, it should fix issue16137 crash on Windows, and indirectly it adds support for year > 9999 on all platforms which is a nice side effect. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue31339> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
