Stefan Krah <[email protected]> added the comment:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 01:31:52PM +0000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> If limited to the original scope, this isn't a new special case, it's fixing
> a bug in the implementation of the existing special case (where it's ignoring
> the trailing comma when it shouldn't be).
This ignores the trailing comma:
f([1,2,3],)
And this:
f(x for x in [1,2,3],)
Seems logical to me.
Do you want to allow the 1,2 to be read as a tuple?
f(x for x in 1,2)
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32012>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
