Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> added the comment: Aye, there are definitely cases where the answer isn't nonsense.
Even for sets though, "a in b < c" isn't an intuitive spelling of "a in b and b < c" the way that "a < b < c" is an intuitive spelling of an ordering relation. Hence filing this as a low priority issue - it's a weird quirk, and potentially worth changing to avoid a particular "Wat?" moment when folks first see it, but it isn't a bug magnet the way some other historical constructs have been. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32055> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
