Benjamin Peterson <[email protected]> added the comment: On Sat, Dec 9, 2017, at 01:06, Serhiy Storchaka wrote: > > Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]> added the comment: > > While we are here, can other changes be made?
All these suggestions seem fine, but they're not in the PEP and the change is already large enough. gps also points out we should expand the timestamp field to 64 bits for 2038 proofing. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <[email protected]> <https://bugs.python.org/issue31650> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
