New submission from Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com>:
Can the peephole optimizer's fold_tuple_on_constants() be moved to ast_opt? It looks to me like there is sufficient information in the tree: import ast print(ast.dump(ast.parse('c = (50+1, 60+2)'))) ----------------------------------------------- Module(body=[Assign(targets=[Name(id='c', ctx=Store())], value=Tuple(elts=[BinOp(left=Num(n=50), op=Add(), right=Num(n=1)), BinOp(left=Num(n=60), op=Add(), right=Num(n=2))], ctx=Load()))], docstring=None) ''' ---------- assignee: serhiy.storchaka components: Interpreter Core messages: 308467 nosy: inada.naoki, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner priority: low severity: normal status: open title: Explore whether peephole.c tuple of constants folding can be an AST transformation versions: Python 3.7 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32344> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com