[issue3811] Update Unicode database to 5.1.0

[Guido van Rossum]

Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:

2008/9/10 Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have now committed the change as r66362 (including the missing
> documentation updates), and ported it to 3.0 as r66363 (where I had to
> change the flag value and regenerate the data, as the flag 0x100 was
> already taken).

That's unfortunate -- perhaps the 2.6 flag and data can be brought in line,
to make future merges easier?

Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11458/unnamed

_______________________________________
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3811>
_______________________________________
2008/9/10 Martin v. Löwis &lt;<a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]</a>&gt;:<br>&gt; I have now committed the change as r66362 
(including the missing<br>&gt; documentation updates), and ported it to 3.0 as 
r66363 (where I had to<br>
&gt; change the flag value and regenerate the data, as the flag 0x100 
was<br>&gt; already taken).<br><br>That&#39;s unfortunate -- perhaps the 2.6 
flag and data can be brought in line, to make future merges easier?<br><br>
-- <br>--Guido van Rossum (home page: <a 
href="http://www.python.org/~guido/";>http://www.python.org/~guido/</a>)<br><br>

_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com