Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
2008/9/10 Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Code point 0x0370 is now a printable character.
> r66381 corrected the failures by simply changing it to 0x0378, until the
> next unicodedata upgrade...
> I wonder if there is a value that is guaranteed to stay non-printable.
The control characters?
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11461/unnamed
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3811>
_______________________________________
2008/9/10 Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <<a href="mailto:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a>>:<br>> Code point 0x0370 is now a
printable character.<br>> r66381 corrected the failures by simply changing
it to 0x0378, until the<br>
> next unicodedata upgrade...<br>> I wonder if there is a value that is
guaranteed to stay non-printable.<br><br>The control characters?<br><br>--
<br>--Guido van Rossum (home page: <a
href="http://www.python.org/~guido/">http://www.python.org/~guido/</a>)<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com