Christian Heimes <li...@cheimes.de> added the comment: Is anybody interested still to solve the problem? I don't see a viable way to solve the issue in a correct way (*). The hashlib API is not designed to provide sufficient information from a digestmod object. I don't want to include hacks like mapping _hashlib.openssl_sha256 function to SHA256 EVP_MD.
(*) correct means: don't call the function, always reuse the hasher's EVP_MD* context and never fall back to slow path silently. ---------- status: open -> pending versions: +Python 3.7 -Python 3.4 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue21288> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
