Jeethu Rao <jee...@jeethurao.com> added the comment: I tried it with a couple of different thresholds, twice each, ignoring the results of the first run. 16 seems to be the sweet spot.
THRESHOLD = 0 jeethu@dev:cpython (3.7_list_insert_memmove)$ ./python -m timeit -s "l = []" "for _ in range(100): l.insert(0, None)" 500 loops, best of 5: 787 usec per loop THRESHOLD = 4 jeethu@dev:cpython (3.7_list_insert_memmove)$ ./python -m timeit -s "l = []" "for _ in range(100): l.insert(0, None)" 500 loops, best of 5: 781 usec per loop THRESHOLD = 8 jeethu@dev:cpython (3.7_list_insert_memmove)$ ./python -m timeit -s "l = []" "for _ in range(100): l.insert(0, None)" 500 loops, best of 5: 780 usec per loop THRESHOLD = 16 jeethu@dev:cpython (3.7_list_insert_memmove)$ ./python -m timeit -s "l = []" "for _ in range(100): l.insert(0, None)" 500 loops, best of 5: 758 usec per loop THRESHOLD = 32 jeethu@dev:cpython (3.7_list_insert_memmove)$ ./python -m timeit -s "l = []" "for _ in range(100): l.insert(0, None)" 500 loops, best of 5: 764 usec per loop ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32534> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
