Eric McDonald <the.eric.mcdon...@gmail.com> added the comment: Yes, this issue could be closed. I think the concept is still valid and perhaps worthy of future consideration as it is a means of unifying two different configuration processing mechanisms in the standard library without having developers reinvent that wheel every time.
I'll close it, though, if having a "stale" issue floating around is bothersome. ---------- resolution: -> later stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue23159> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
