Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> added the comment: +1.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018, 16:26 Tim Peters <[email protected]> wrote: > > Tim Peters <[email protected]> added the comment: > > Thanks, Guido! I figured I was missing something :-) > > It looks like `numbers.Rational` _is_ a "for real" base class of > `fractions.Fraction`, though, so I'm in favor of supplying a default > implementation of `.as_integer_ratio()` in `numbers.Rational` anyway. That > would make a clear statement of intent, and would do the right thing for > `Fraction` instances. > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <[email protected]> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue33073> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <[email protected]> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33073> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
