Paweł <pawciob...@gmail.com> added the comment: I didn't find this and created a duplicate https://bugs.python.org/issue33027
I've added similar/updated changes https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/6027 @r.david.murray wouldn't it be wise to do one step at a time rather than implementing full support for RFC6266? Please tell exactly what is your expectations so I can fix the patch if it needs to be fixed. This is also related to RFC5987 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5987 https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Content-Disposition ---------- components: +Unicode nosy: +ezio.melotti, pawciobiel, vstinner pull_requests: +5937 stage: -> patch review title: RFC6266 support (Content-Disposition for HTTP) -> support encoded filename in Content-Disposition for HTTP in cgi.FieldStorage versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5, Python 3.7, Python 3.8 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue23434> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
