Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > I see a list of owners in the code (although it's difficult to infer > real names or email addresses from that list). I think we should not > include the code without their explicit approval.
I know they *want* this to happen, no worries on this front. > The question will then always be: what is the official master copy of > the code? The one in Python, or the one on Google code? Whose > responsibility would it be to keep those synchronized, and incorporate > changes from one copy into the other? > > I would prefer if the copy in Python (say, 2.7) becomes the master copy, > and the copy on Google code eventually disappears (when interest in > older Python versions has died). I'm in favor of this, and I believe the authors at Google are too -- it was written out of necessity, and once integrated, the need for a separate Google copy will go away. > I would object to a mere fork of the code (i.e. where one of the regular > Python committers incorporates, from time to time, the changes that > Google made) Agreed. _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3959> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
