Carl Meyer <c...@oddbird.net> added the comment: > I don't think it makes sense to try to make cached_property itself work > implicitly with both normal attributes and slot entries - instead, > cached_property can handle the common case as simply and efficiently as > possible, and the cached_slot case can be either handled separately or else > not at all.
So it sounds like the current approach here is good to move forward? If I update the patch during the PyCon sprints, we could merge it? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue21145> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
