STINNER Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: This issue is a stack overflow: your code do recursive calls to internal_print().
Backtrace from gdb: -------------------------------------------- #0 0xb7e92064 in _IO_new_file_overflow () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #1 0xb7e94bc3 in __overflow () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #2 0xb7e8e03b in fputc () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #3 0x080a2f2d in tupleprint (op=0xb7b5cc2c, fp=0xb7f744e0, flags=0) at Objects/tupleobject.c:193 #4 0x0808b9f7 in internal_print (op=0xb7b5cc2c, fp=0xb7f744e0, flags=0, nesting=0) at Objects/object.c:309 #5 0x0808ba60 in PyObject_Print (op=0xb7b5cc2c, fp=0xb7f744e0, flags=0) at Objects/object.c:324 (...) #4628 0x0808ba60 in PyObject_Print (op=0xb7b68e4c, fp=0xb7f744e0, flags=0) at Objects/object.c:324 #4629 0x080a2f9e in tupleprint (op=0xb7b68e6c, fp=0xb7f744e0, flags=0) at Objects/tupleobject.c:201 #4630 0x0808b9f7 in internal_print (op=0xb7b68e6c, fp=0xb7f744e0, flags=0, nesting=0) at Objects/object.c:309 #4631 0x0808ba60 in PyObject_Print (op=0xb7b68e6c, fp=0xb7f744e0, flags=0) at Objects/object.c:324 (...) #4638 0x080a2f9e in tupleprint (op=0xb7b68ecc, fp=0xb7f744e0, flags=0) at Objects/tupleobject.c:201 #4639 0x0808b9f7 in internal_print (op=0xb7b68ecc, fp=0xb7f744e0, flags=0, nesting=0) at Objects/object.c:309 #4640 0x0808ba60 in PyObject_Print (op=0xb7b68ecc, fp=0xb7f744e0, flags=0) at Objects/object.c:324 #4641 0x080a2f9e in tupleprint (op=0xb7b68eec, fp=0xb7f744e0, flags=0) at Objects/tupleobject.c:201 #4642 0x0808b9f7 in internal_print (op=0xb7b68eec, fp=0xb7f744e0, flags=0, nesting=0) at Objects/object.c:309 (...) -------------------------------------------- Informations using my debugger (python-ptrace): ------------------------------------------------------------ PID: 1201 Signal: SIGSEGV STACK OVERFLOW! Stack pointer is in 0xbf10d000-0xbf90d000 => [stack] (rw-p) - instruction: CALL 0x80d3305 - mapping: 0xbf10cff0 is not mapped in memory - register <stack ptr>=0xbf10cff0 ------------------------------------------------------------ Some solutions: - avoid creation of nested sequence - create generic protection against stack overflow (use setjmp/longjmp) - avoid recursive call to internal_print() ---------- nosy: +haypo _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1069092> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
