Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be> added the comment:
> One other thing I will say is that the PEP 302 APIs were seemingly designed > for working with Python source and were not necessarily oriented towards > alternative code representations that were executed That's also my impression. I'm perfectly fine with saying that the get_source() method defined in PEP 302 only applies to Python sources. That, together with the fact that we are really looking for *filenames* not *modules* is why the fix should involve the linecache module and not PEP 302. In https://bugs.python.org/issue32797#msg323106 Nick seemed to agree with that. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32797> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
