Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org> added the comment:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018, at 23:59, Erwan Le Pape wrote: > > Erwan Le Pape <lepaperw...@gmail.com> added the comment: > > Great! My only concern with that is marshalling of untrusted data at > runtime (I know, you shouldn't do that) can become a much more expensive > operation. > > Is there any internal use of marshal beyond .pycs used at runtime by the > core interpreter that might be affected by such a change? Writing pycs is the only supported use of marhsal. > > If not, it seems (to me) an acceptable modification of marshal and I'll > submit a PR for it. What exactly are you proposing? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue34686> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
