kai zhu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: hi, i'm happy i got a response on this :)
anyway, can u elaborate on the "reason" y something like this was never done? yes, i kno the patch is rough right now (& will never get accepted in its current state), but its now proven to work, & gives migrating developers *something* to test their py3k_syntax code while *still* maintaining compatibility w/ python2.x extension modules. isn't that the spirit of python 2.7? in the meantime, i'm in no hurry to have anything committed. Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11845/example_py3k.py _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3238> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
