Yury Selivanov <yseliva...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> I assume there is some place that notices that the while condition is a > constant, and therefore doesn't need to be explicitly evaluated? To answer your question: yes, and it's unrelated to both peephole optimizer and to the above mentioned grand refactoring of the ceval loop :) But if we add "-X noopt" (or equivalent) we can disable those micro-optimizations too. Let's track this in https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/9693 ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue34888> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
