Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> added the comment: > What would make it not reentrant-safe?
Probably the most obvious example of a non-reentrant-safe operation is taking a lock. It's very natural to write code like: def call_soon(...): with self._call_soon_lock: ... but now imagine that inside the body of that 'with' statement, a signal arrives, so the interpreter pauses what it's doing to invoke the signal handler, and the signal handler turns around and invokes call_soon, which tries to acquire the same lock that it already holds → instant deadlock. And this rules out quite a few of the tools you might normally expect to use in thread-safe code, like queue.Queue, since they use locks internally. The reason I think the stdlib's call_soon is OK is that it doesn't perform any blocking operations, and the critical operation is simply 'self._ready.append(...)', which in CPython is atomic with respect to threads/signals/GC. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue34968> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com