New submission from Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de>:

I see reports from Cython users on Windows-64 that extension modules that use 
"longintrepr.h" get miscompiled by MinGW. A failing setup looks as follows:

Stock 64 bit CPython on Windows, e.g.
Python 3.6.3 (v3.6.3:2c5fed8, Oct  3 2017, 18:11:49) [MSC v.1900 64 bit (AMD64)]

MinGW uses this compile time setup, i.e. 15 bit digits:
PyLong_BASE  0x8000
PyLong_MASK  7FFF
PyLong_SHIFT  15
sizeof(digit)  2
sizeof(sdigit)  2

Whereas CPython reports the following, indicating that it was in fact built 
with 30 bit digits:
sys.getsize(1, 2**14, 2**15, 2**29, 2**30, 2**63, 2**64)  (28, 28, 28, 28, 32, 
36, 36)

I'm not sure if this also applies to Py2.7, but I don't think the PyLong 
implementations differ in this regard.

The compile time PyLong digit size is not remembered by the CPython 
installation and instead determined on the fly by the extension compiler. It 
seems that the MSVC build of the stock CPython packages differs from what MinGW 
decides here. This renders MinGW unusable for code that uses "longintrepr.h", 
which Cython does by default in order to accelerate its unpacking of PyLong 
values.

Is there a reason why CPython cannot store its compile time value for the 
PYLONG_BITS_IN_DIGIT setting somewhere?

----------
components: Extension Modules, Windows
messages: 328197
nosy: paul.moore, scoder, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: PYLONG_BITS_IN_DIGIT differs between MinGW and MSVC
type: compile error
versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.5, Python 3.6, Python 3.7, Python 3.8

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35037>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to