Hrvoje Nikšić <hnik...@gmail.com> added the comment: I didn't start working on the PR, so please go ahead if you're interested.
One small suggestion: If you're implementing this, please note that the proof-of-concept implementation shown in the description is not very efficient because each call to `wait` has to iterate over all the futures (which can be potentially large in number) to set up and tear down the done callbacks on each one. A more efficient implementation would set up the callbacks only once - see https://stackoverflow.com/a/51403277/1600898 for an example. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33533> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
