Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com> added the comment:

Correct.  The remaining call to Py_AddPendingCall in the signal-handling code 
is fine.

This issue is only indirectly related.  I suppose you could consider it a 
follow-up to #30703.  The PR for that issue (GH-2415) switches from using 
pending calls for signal handlers to using the pending calls machinery without 
actual pending calls.

So here I want to address taking the next step: deal with pending signals 
separately from pending calls.  That separation helps simplify efforts to adapt 
the pending calls machinery for use in arbitrary threads (rather than the main 
thread).  See #33608.

----------
components: +Interpreter Core
nosy: +pitrou

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35423>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to