Giampaolo Rodola' <g.rod...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I see. Then I would say it's a matter of deciding what's the best API to provide. Another possibility is to promote the underlying epoll() instance as a public property, so one can do: >>> s = selectors.EpollSelector() >>> s.register(fd, EVENT_READ) >>> s.selector.modify(fd, select.EPOLLEXCLUSIVE) That raises the question whether all selector classes should have a public "selector" attribute. poll() and devpoll() related classes may need it for POLLPRI, POLLRDHUP, POLLWRBAND or others (whatever their use case is). kqueue() also has it's own specific constants (KQ_FILTER_* and KQ_EV_*). The only one where a public "selector" property would be useless is SelectSelector. ---------- stage: patch review -> _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue35517> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
